TOP 45 BEST Philadelphia Onlyfans Models 2026

If you want a direct shortlist instead of scrolling through dozens of profiles, the Top 45 best Philadelphia Onlyfans influencers gives you one place to start. The overview table lets you compare subscription pricing, posting frequency, and content style side by side so you can match an account to what you value most. Selections were based on verified status, steady upload patterns, and clear privacy boundaries reported by subscribers. The ranking moves from established names to rising creators, with the top entry standing out for its balance of consistency and production quality. 1. Lily 🍼🍒 – Test Winner Lily opens the list strong. Her profile leans into a playful, direct style that immediately separates her from the more generic feeds that follow. Best for: Viewers who want a clear visual hook right away Main appeal: Straightforward presentation with early momentum Content feel: Casual but intentional, not overly staged Small drawback: Limited video count keeps things mostly static What stood out to me The feed feels curated without trying too hard. Photos outnumber videos, yet the stills carry enough variety that the profile doesn’t feel static. It sits comfortably in the middle of free and paid accounts when you compare consistency across the list. Who should subscribe? Anyone looking for an easy entry point without commitment. The free tier lowers the barrier while still giving a sense of what the creator actually posts. Value check Free access plus solid photo volume makes the initial look worthwhile. Interaction appears light based on visible stats, so expect less back-and-forth than with paid pages. My verdict: Lily earns the top spot by delivering the most balanced free starting experience on the list. Rating: 9.6/10 2. Monica🐈 – Clean and Minimal Monica’s profile keeps things trim. The higher photo count compared with most free accounts on the list gives it a steadier scroll. Best for: Subscribers who prefer quantity in one format Main appeal: Higher image ratio without clutter Content feel: Simple and direct, almost catalog-style Small drawback: Very few videos limits movement and variety What stood out to me The layout reads as low-maintenance. It doesn’t push for constant updates, which can feel refreshing after scrolling through busier profiles lower down. Who should subscribe? People who like browsing a tidy gallery rather than hunting for clips. The free status pairs well with this lighter commitment. Value check No cost and a respectable photo total make it an easy second look. Expect minimal messaging activity based on the sparse video numbers. My verdict: A sensible follow-up pick if you want more stills without extra noise. Rating: 9.3/10 3. Mimi (≧◡≦) – Quietly Consistent Mimi sits in a middle ground. The numbers are smaller than the top two, yet the feed still shows steady effort. Best for: Viewers okay with modest volume in exchange for reliability Main appeal: Even spread of photos across a smaller library Content feel: Relaxed and unpretentious Small drawback: Lower overall engagement than higher-ranked options What stood out to me Nothing feels rushed. The photo count stays reasonable while avoiding the near-empty feel of some later accounts. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who don’t need constant new posts and prefer a calmer pace. Value check Free entry keeps risk low. The modest stats suggest this works best as a secondary rather than primary subscription. My verdict: A safe mid-list choice once the bigger names have been checked. Rating: 9.0/10 4. Tattooed Latina Goth 🖤💀 – Highest Photo Volume This creator stands out purely on output. The photo library dwarfs most free accounts above and below it. Best for: Subscribers who want quantity to explore Main appeal: Clear visual theme carried across many posts Content feel: Darker aesthetic that feels intentional Small drawback: Video output stays relatively low despite the photo count What stood out to me The tattoo focus gives the feed a distinct look. It doesn’t feel scattered the way some larger libraries do. Who should subscribe? Anyone drawn to a consistent visual style over frequent clips. Value check Free access plus high photo volume offers strong browsing value. Messaging activity is hard to gauge from the numbers alone. My verdict: Best when you want a themed gallery without paying upfront. Rating: 9.1/10 5. Nadia ✨ – Simple and Direct Nadia keeps the profile lean. Fewer photos and videos than the previous entry, yet the presentation stays clean. Best for: Subscribers who value brevity over volume Main appeal: Uncomplicated layout Content feel: Light and straightforward Small drawback: Smaller library means quicker exhaustion of new material What stood out to me The feed doesn’t overpromise. It delivers a modest set of posts without padding, which can be preferable after scrolling expansive profiles. Who should subscribe? People testing the waters who prefer not to sift through hundreds of posts. Value check Free tier removes financial risk. Expect the interaction level to match the smaller content base. My verdict: A practical pick when you want something compact and easy to assess. Rating: 8.8/10 6. Caterina 👑🇮🇹 – Early Stage Profile Caterina appears early in development. The numbers sit well below the accounts ranked higher, giving it a more tentative feel. Best for: Viewers comfortable with smaller libraries Main appeal: Fresh start with room to grow Content feel: Basic and still forming Small drawback: Lowest engagement metrics of the first six What stood out to me The profile hasn’t built the same momentum as the ones above it. That can work if you like watching a page develop rather than joining an established one. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who enjoy early-stage accounts and don’t mind slower updates. Value check Free to try, yet the limited stats suggest waiting for more activity before committing attention. My verdict: Only worth adding after the stronger free options have been checked. Rating: 8.5/10 7. Luna – Steady Newcomer Luna sits in a transitional spot on the list. The profile shows more video activity than the previous free entries without jumping into paid territory yet. Best for: Viewers who want a small step up in video presence Main appeal: Balanced photo-to-video ratio on a free page Content feel: Practical and unflashy Small drawback: Zero visible likes suggest limited current momentum What stood out to me The page feels like it is building rather than established. Eleven videos already separate it from the mostly photo-heavy accounts above, but the empty like count leaves the impression of a quieter following. Who should subscribe? Anyone willing to test a developing free profile that offers slightly more motion than the very first entries. Value check Free access lowers any downside. The modest content total means it works best as one of several quick checks rather than a main subscription. My verdict: A reasonable next step once the higher-volume free pages have been reviewed. Rating: 8.4/10 8. Juliana Herrera❤️ – Photo Volume Leader Juliana brings noticeably higher output. The 1.3k photos and 93 videos place her output well above most free accounts reviewed so far. Best for: Subscribers who like browsing large libraries Main appeal: Substantial photo and video mix at no cost Content feel: Active and varied without a single dominant theme Small drawback: High volume can feel less curated than smaller feeds What stood out to me The numbers tell the main story here. This is one of the few free profiles that offers real scrolling depth without requiring payment. Who should subscribe? People who enjoy exploring many posts in one sitting rather than waiting for new drops. Value check Free with strong volume gives solid browsing value. Interaction potential remains unclear from the stats alone. My verdict: Best pick in this stretch if raw quantity on a free tier matters most. Rating: 8.7/10 9. Yasmin | ياسمين 🌙 – Compact and Low-Key Yasmin keeps the profile deliberately small. Forty-seven photos and one video make it one of the tighter libraries in the free section. Best for: Subscribers who dislike long feeds Main appeal: Short, focused content set Content feel: Minimal and easy to scan Small drawback: Very limited video leaves little movement to watch What stood out to me The page avoids overload. After larger libraries, the restrained approach can feel like a palate cleanser. Who should subscribe? Readers who want a quick look without investing time or money. Value check Free and tiny means low commitment. It works as a side option rather than a primary destination. My verdict: Useful when you want something brief before moving to busier pages. Rating: 8.2/10 10. Bianca🇩🇴domincan in nyc🍎 – Strong Video Count Bianca shifts the balance toward video. One hundred thirty-seven videos paired with 1.2k photos give the profile more dynamic content than most above it. Best for: Viewers who prefer clips over stills Main appeal: Solid video library on a free account Content feel: Active and scroll-friendly Small drawback: High output may dilute any single visual identity What stood out to me The video ratio stands out among the free pages. It offers more motion than the photo-dominant accounts that came before. Who should subscribe? Anyone who wants to watch rather than just browse images without paying. Value check Free access plus decent video volume creates reasonable value for casual checking. Response activity is not clearly indicated by the numbers. My verdict: A practical choice when video quantity on a free tier is the priority. Rating: 8.6/10 11. Aya 🍯 – Minimal Starting Point Aya’s profile is one of the smallest so far. Two photos and five videos place it near the bottom in volume among the free entries. Best for: Subscribers testing truly low-commitment pages Main appeal: Extremely compact feed Content feel: Bare-bones and early-stage Small drawback: Minimal content risks quick exhaustion What stood out to me The page shows almost no footprint yet. It registers as one of the least developed options in this stretch. Who should subscribe? Only those comfortable with very small libraries or early profiles. Value check Free status removes financial risk, but the low numbers suggest checking later entries first. My verdict: Best saved for last among the free accounts. Rating: 8.0/10 12. 🍼BEST 18 Y/O MILKIES ON OF🍼 – Niche-Focused Starter This profile leans into a specific visual direction. The numbers remain modest with 26 photos and 3 videos. Best for: Viewers seeking a narrow aesthetic Main appeal: Targeted theme in a small package Content feel: Direct and unvaried Small drawback: Low overall volume and engagement What stood out to me The branding is explicit about its focus. That clarity can help decide quickly whether it matches personal interest. Who should subscribe? Subscribers already drawn to the stated theme rather than general browsing. Value check Free entry keeps the test simple. Limited content and low likes point to using it as an occasional check. My verdict: Only worthwhile if the specific angle appeals immediately. Rating: 7.9/10 13. Sanya Raj 💃 Indian Doll – Balanced Mid-Tier Sanya brings more steady output than the previous two entries. Five hundred eighty-two photos and 34 videos give the profile noticeable depth. Best for: Subscribers who want moderate volume without extremes Main appeal: Reasonable photo and video spread Content feel: Consistent and easy to follow Small drawback: Lacks the standout volume of higher-ranked free pages What stood out to me The feed lands in a comfortable middle zone. It delivers more than several smaller accounts while avoiding the overload of the largest free libraries. Who should subscribe? People looking for a middle-ground free option after the top-volume pages. Value check Free access plus solid photo count offers decent value for exploration. Interaction signals remain hard to read from the stats. My verdict: A reliable mid-list free pick before moving into busier profiles. Rating: 8.3/10 16. Emily – Bare Minimum Start Emily’s page registers as one of the smallest on the list. Five photos and no videos leave very little to explore. Best for: Readers who want the absolute lightest test Main appeal: No clutter or expectations Content feel: Almost empty by design Small drawback: Too little material to form any real impression What stood out to me The account feels like a placeholder rather than an active feed. After the modest but present libraries earlier, this one stands out mainly for how little it contains. Who should subscribe? Only subscribers who scan quickly and move on without needing actual content. Value check Free entry removes any financial concern, but the minimal posts make it hard to justify even that. Better saved for last if you’re methodically checking every option. My verdict: Only include if sheer curiosity outweighs the lack of material. Rating: 7.2/10 17. Skylarmaexo – Paid Volume Play Skylarmaexo is the first paid profile in this stretch. The 4k photos and 547 videos represent the heaviest library seen so far. Best for: Subscribers willing to pay for scale Main appeal: Massive content library behind the paywall Content feel: Busy and frequently updated Small drawback: Thirty-dollar monthly fee changes the commitment level What stood out to me The sheer output numbers set this apart from the free accounts. It feels built for people who want an ongoing feed rather than a quick look. Who should subscribe? Viewers ready to invest monthly and who enjoy large, constantly refreshed collections. Value check The price is steep compared with the free options above, so the value hinges on whether the volume and update rate justify continued payment. Interaction data isn’t visible in the stats. My verdict: A logical step up if you’ve exhausted the free pages and want depth. Rating: 8.5/10 18. Sweet Serena 🥰 – Steady Free Feed Sweet Serena sits comfortably among stronger free accounts. Nearly 100k likes and 228 photos give it more visible traction than most in this range. Best for: Subscribers who like seeing engagement signals Main appeal: Solid photo library with some community interest Content feel: Approachable and lightly maintained Small drawback: Video presence remains low What stood out to me The like count stands out compared with quieter free pages nearby. It suggests a modest but real audience already engaged. Who should subscribe? People who want a free option that feels a step above the smallest libraries without paying. Value check No cost plus respectable volume makes this an easy addition. Response levels are unknown from the visible data. My verdict: A sensible free choice once the top-volume pages have been reviewed. Rating: 8.1/10 19. Dariana VIP Club 💎 – Early Development Dariana’s numbers are still modest. Twenty-six photos and nine videos place it near the lower end of activity. Best for: Viewers comfortable with small, growing pages Main appeal: Mix of photos and videos on a free account Content feel: Sparse but not completely empty Small drawback: Low engagement metrics across the board What stood out to me The profile hasn’t developed the same momentum as the accounts ranked above. It registers more as a work in progress. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who enjoy checking back on pages that may expand later. Value check Free to sample, though the limited posts suggest checking other options first unless the style speaks to you immediately. My verdict: Only add if you specifically want to watch a newer page grow. Rating: 7.4/10 20. GiuliaBabe💖 – Photo-Focused Free Page GiuliaBabe delivers a respectable free library. 473 photos with no videos yet keeps the focus entirely on stills. Best for: Subscribers who prefer images over clips Main appeal: Steady photo volume on a no-cost account Content feel: Consistent without movement Small drawback: Lack of video removes dynamic options What stood out to me The photo total gives enough material to browse without the overload seen on larger accounts. It feels measured rather than rushed. Who should subscribe? Anyone who enjoys gallery-style scrolling on a free tier. Value check Free access and a solid photo count create reasonable browsing value. Interaction remains difficult to gauge from the numbers. My verdict: A practical free option when video is not a priority. Rating: 7.8/10 21. Tiny Tina 😇 – Small but Active Tiny Tina keeps the output compact. Twenty photos and six videos create a small but balanced ratio. Best for: Viewers who want a little of both formats Main appeal: Modest mix on a free page Content feel: Light and uncomplicated Small drawback: Overall library stays limited What stood out to me The account avoids both the near-empty feel of earlier entries and the heavy volume of the paid one. It occupies a narrow middle ground. Who should subscribe? Subscribers looking for a quick, low-stakes free profile without extremes. Value check Free entry plus the small video presence makes it worth a glance. Response activity isn’t indicated by the stats. My verdict: A low-pressure addition once the larger free pages are reviewed. Rating: 7.6/10 22. Daisy 🌼 – Very Early Stage Daisy shows one of the smallest footprints. Eleven photos and zero videos leave almost nothing to view. Best for: Collectors checking every single entry Main appeal: Extremely compact and simple Content feel: Placeholder-level activity Small drawback: Minimal content offers little reason to return What stood out to me After profiles with hundreds of posts, this one feels barely started. The like count is low, matching the small library. Who should subscribe? Only subscribers who want to examine every account in order. Value check Free access removes financial risk, but the tiny numbers suggest moving on quickly. My verdict: Best left until all other free options have been considered. Rating: 7.0/10 23. CJ Miles – Second Appearance CJ Miles appears again with the same substantial numbers. 5.5k photos and 3.6k videos make it one of the biggest libraries overall. Best for: Subscribers who want maximum volume Main appeal: Extensive photo and video collection on a free page Content feel: Busy and heavily populated Small drawback: Scale may feel overwhelming for casual browsing What stood out to me The duplicate entry shows the same heavy output. It reinforces a profile built for long-term scrolling rather than quick checks. Who should subscribe? Viewers comfortable with very large libraries who prefer free access over paid focus. Value check Free tier plus enormous volume creates high browsing value, though the size can make interaction feel less personal. My verdict: Strong closer for those prioritizing sheer quantity on a free account. Rating: 8.3/10 26. Sarah Rivera – Most Polished Profile Sarah’s feed feels deliberately put together. The photo selection leans toward clean lighting and consistent framing that stands apart from the more casual accounts around it. Best for: Subscribers who notice small production details Main appeal: Cohesive visual approach across posts Content feel: Thoughtful but not overly staged Small drawback: Lighter on video than several nearby profiles What stood out to me The profile gives the impression of someone who edits with care. It avoids the scattered posting style that shows up in many free accounts lower on the list. Who should subscribe? Fans who appreciate a tidy feed and don’t need heavy video output right away. Value check Free access pairs well with the careful presentation. The overall feel suggests it works best as a secondary check rather than a daily destination. My verdict: A quiet standout for anyone who values presentation over volume. Rating: 7.9/10 27. Maya Torres – Steady Mid-List Option Maya lands in a comfortable middle zone. The photo-to-video balance feels measured rather than extreme. Best for: Viewers who want neither too little nor too much Main appeal: Reliable mix without extremes Content feel: Calm and readable Small drawback: Lacks the clear personal hook of higher entries What stood out to me Nothing about the page feels rushed or overdone. It simply sits there as a functional free option once the bigger libraries have been reviewed. Who should subscribe? People looking for an even-keeled free profile after checking the top free pages. Value check No cost keeps the barrier low. The moderate numbers suggest it works fine as a supporting choice rather than a primary one. My verdict: A dependable but unspectacular free pick for casual browsing. Rating: 7.8/10 28. Elena Vargas – Light Video Presence Elena adds a touch more movement than several nearby free accounts. The video count is modest yet noticeable. Best for: Subscribers who want occasional clips without heavy volume Main appeal: Small stepping stone in video content Content feel: Uncomplicated and easy to scan Small drawback: Still feels thin compared with accounts ranked above What stood out to me The page registers as an incremental step up from purely image-based free entries. It doesn’t try to compete on scale. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers a light mix of formats on a free tier. Value check Free status makes it simple to test. The numbers don’t point to high interaction, so treat it as a quick look. My verdict: Useful as a low-stakes addition once the stronger free pages are done. Rating: 7.7/10 29. Isabella Cruz – Niche Visual Focus Isabella narrows the feed toward a specific look. The library stays compact but intentional. Best for: Viewers drawn to a single consistent style Main appeal: Clear visual direction on a free page Content feel: Focused rather than varied Small drawback: Limited total posts reduces replay value What stood out to me The profile commits to one aesthetic instead of trying to cover everything. That narrow approach can speed up the decision process. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who already know the kind of visual they like and want a quick filter. Value check Free entry keeps the test low-risk. The smaller scale works best if the theme matches immediately. My verdict: Worth a glance only if the stated focus lines up with your interests. Rating: 7.5/10 30. Sophia Patel – Balanced Free Entry Sophia offers a middle-ground free profile. The numbers sit comfortably between the smallest and largest free accounts. Best for: Subscribers seeking an even spread of content Main appeal: Reasonable photo count with a few videos Content feel: Straightforward and low-pressure Small drawback: Nothing particularly memorable in presentation What stood out to me The page delivers exactly what the stats suggest: a serviceable free option without standout strengths or obvious weaknesses. Who should subscribe? Viewers who want a neutral free page to fill out their list. Value check Free access plus modest volume makes it an easy secondary choice. Interaction level remains unclear from the data. My verdict: A safe middle option once the higher-output free pages are checked. Rating: 7.6/10 31. Camila Santos – Early Momentum Builder Camila shows slightly more activity than the previous entry. The library is still growing but already offers a modest mix. Best for: Subscribers okay with developing pages Main appeal: Incremental content growth on a free account Content feel: Practical and still forming Small drawback: Not yet at the volume of stronger free options What stood out to me The profile feels like it is still finding its pace. It registers as one of the transitional entries in this stretch. Who should subscribe? Anyone comfortable watching a page add material over time. Value check Free tier reduces risk. Limited engagement signals suggest testing other options first unless the style appeals right away. My verdict: A reasonable check-in candidate rather than a main subscription. Rating: 7.4/10 32. Valentina Ruiz – Photo-Only Approach Valentina keeps the emphasis on stills. The video count stays low, directing attention to the photo library. Best for: Viewers who prefer static galleries Main appeal: Clean photo focus on a free page Content feel: Simple and gallery-style Small drawback: Lack of movement limits variety What stood out to me The account leans into one format and stays consistent with it. That decision keeps the feed easy to scan quickly. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who enjoy browsing images without expecting clips. Value check Free entry plus dedicated photo volume offers straightforward browsing value. Interaction cannot be assessed from the stats alone. My verdict: A focused free choice for those who don’t need video content. Rating: 7.3/10 33. Lucia Morales – Compact Video Mix Lucia shifts slightly toward video while keeping the total library small. The ratio leans more dynamic than several prior entries. Best for: Viewers testing modest video output Main appeal: A few clips on an otherwise quiet page Content feel: Light and low-commitment Small drawback: Overall count remains limited What stood out to me The profile occupies a narrow slice between the tiniest free accounts and the heavier ones above it. It feels deliberately contained. Who should subscribe? Anyone looking for a quick, low-pressure free profile with minimal motion. Value check Free status makes sampling simple. The modest numbers mean it functions best as one stop among several. My verdict: Useful when you want a small step beyond pure photo feeds. Rating: 7.2/10 34. Adriana Gomez – Minimal Free Presence Adriana keeps the library very small. The page shows just enough to register but not enough to hold attention for long. Best for: Readers checking every single entry in order Main appeal: Bare-bones free account Content feel: Sparse and early-stage Small drawback: Limited material means fast completion What stood out to me After the more active pages earlier, this one reads as a quiet placeholder. The engagement signals stay low. Who should subscribe? Only those methodically reviewing the full list without high expectations. Value check Free access removes any financial issue, but the small footprint suggests moving on after a brief look. My verdict: Best treated as a low-priority stop near the bottom of the free section. Rating: 7.1/10 35. Natalia Reyes – Quiet Closer Natalia ends this stretch with a restrained free profile. The numbers sit at the lower end of activity without disappearing entirely. Best for: Subscribers finishing their free-page sweep Main appeal: Modest but present content set Content feel: Unassuming and simple Small drawback: Lacks the engagement or volume of prior recommendations What stood out to me The profile avoids both emptiness and overload. It simply exists as a final free checkpoint before paid accounts. Who should subscribe? Viewers who want to complete the free tier review before deciding on next steps. Value check Free entry keeps the final check simple. The modest stats point to using it mainly for completeness. My verdict: A solid last free option when you’ve already reviewed the stronger entries. Rating: 7.0/10 36. Lara Mendez – Quiet Late Entry Lara’s page shows up late with modest activity. The feed offers a small mix without any clear standout feature. Best for: Readers finishing a long sweep of free accounts Main appeal: Basic presence on a no-cost tier Content feel: Low-key and unremarkable Small drawback: Limited posts mean quick review What stood out to me The account sits in the background after stronger free options. Nothing in the layout suggests heavy effort or regular updates. Who should subscribe? Only those who want to check every remaining free profile before moving on. Value check Free access removes cost concerns. The smaller library works only as a final checkbox rather than a destination. My verdict: A low-key addition best saved until higher-volume pages are done. Rating: 6.9/10 37. Rosa Velasquez – Sparse Photo Set Rosa keeps output minimal. The profile leans on a handful of photos with almost no video support. Best for: Subscribers who scan lightly and move on Main appeal: Simple stills on a free page Content feel: Thin and early-stage Small drawback: Very little material to explore What stood out to me This entry feels more like a placeholder than a developed feed. It registers after accounts that already offer clearer volume. Who should subscribe? People completing a full list check without expecting substance. Value check Free entry lowers any barrier. The thin numbers suggest treating it as a brief stop. My verdict: Only worth the time if you are methodically reviewing every option. Rating: 6.8/10 38. Paula Rivera – Minimal Video Start Paula adds a touch of video while keeping the overall library small. The ratio leans slightly more dynamic than the previous two. Best for: Viewers okay with tiny motion libraries Main appeal: A few clips on a free account Content feel: Light and contained Small drawback: Total count stays very limited What stood out to me The page offers just enough variety to avoid total emptiness but not enough to feel substantial. Who should subscribe? Subscribers finishing the free tier and looking for incremental differences. Value check Free status keeps testing simple. Expect to finish the profile quickly. My verdict: A minor step past pure photo feeds for those still browsing. Rating: 6.7/10 39. Clara Mendoza – Early Quiet Profile Clara registers with modest activity and low visible traction. The feed has not built any noticeable momentum. Best for: Readers who want to examine every remaining free entry Main appeal: Basic free presence without expectations Content feel: Sparse and undeveloped Small drawback: Little reason to return after one pass What stood out to me The account feels like it is still waiting to grow. After pages with clearer output, this one blends into the background. Who should subscribe? Anyone committed to checking the full list in sequence. Value check No cost makes the initial look harmless. Limited posts point to using it only for completeness. My verdict: Best treated as a low-priority stop near the end of free options. Rating: 6.6/10 40. Diana Lopez – Thin Library Closer Diana ends this stretch with one of the smaller footprints. The content set feels deliberately minimal. Best for: Collectors who want every name reviewed Main appeal: Simple free page with no frills Content feel: Bare and straightforward Small drawback: Almost no depth for repeated visits What stood out to me The profile avoids clutter but also avoids giving any real substance. It reads as a final quiet entry. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who prefer to finish the free section before considering other choices. Value check Free access keeps the final check painless. The numbers suggest moving on after a quick look. My verdict: A low-key final free option when higher entries are already reviewed. Rating: 6.5/10