TOP 47 BEST Olathe Onlyfans Models 2026

If you want a fast shortlist without hours of research, this ranking of the Top 47 best Olathe Onlyfans influencers puts the strongest options in one place. The overview and table let you compare creators side by side on details such as subscription pricing, posting frequency, and overall authenticity. Selections were based on verified accounts, steady consistency in output, and attention to production quality. The number one spot goes to a creator who maintains strong boundaries while delivering regular updates. 1. ✨ Kate ✨ – Test Winner Kate sits at the top of this list for a reason. Her profile feels balanced in a way many others don’t, especially within the smaller Olathe creator scene. Best for: Subscribers who want a steady mix of photos and short videos Main appeal: Clean presentation with consistent posting Content feel: Casual and approachable rather than overly produced Small drawback: Fewer long videos than some of the bigger accounts below What stood out to me Her feed looks organized without feeling stiff. The photos are well lit and the short clips give just enough movement to keep things interesting. It doesn’t feel like she’s trying too hard to stand out, which actually makes the profile easier to scroll through regularly. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers a straightforward, low-drama feed over flashy production. Good fit if you want updates that feel local and relaxed rather than polished influencer content. Value check Free to join with a decent photo-to-video ratio. Interaction seems average based on how the profile is set up, so don’t expect constant replies if that’s your main goal. My verdict: The most well-rounded starting point on this list for most Olathe viewers. Rating: 9.4/10 2. Adriana Olivera🇧🇷🇺🇸 – Most Consistent Poster Adriana shows up more regularly than many creators in similar positions. That reliability helped her land the second spot. Best for: People who like frequent new photos without long gaps Main appeal: High photo count paired with decent video volume Content feel: Straightforward and slightly playful Small drawback: Video length tends to stay short across the board What stood out to me The profile gives off a steady, no-nonsense vibe. It’s easy to see she uploads often enough that the feed doesn’t feel stale after a week or two. Who should subscribe? Viewers who check feeds regularly and want fresh material without waiting. Less ideal if you prefer longer video updates. Value check Free account with solid volume. The numbers suggest she’s active, though personal messaging volume looks typical for free profiles in this niche. My verdict: Reliable choice when you want something new to scroll most days. Rating: 9.1/10 3. dev wilson – Small But Growing Dev’s account is smaller and newer, which is why it sits in the middle of the top six rather than higher. Best for: People okay with slower upload schedules Main appeal: Simpler, less crowded feed Content feel: Very casual with minimal production Small drawback: Limited total posts compared to the accounts around it What stood out to me Everything feels unpolished in a genuine way. There’s not much content yet, so the profile still has room to develop its own style. Who should subscribe? Viewers who like supporting smaller creators early and don’t mind waiting between posts. Value check Free to follow. Low volume means you won’t get daily updates right now, but that could change if posting picks up. My verdict: Worth a look only if you prefer smaller, developing profiles. Rating: 8.7/10 4. Larissa Silva🇧🇷Chocolate🍫 – Highest Engagement Here Larissa has the strongest like count among the first six, which pushed her into the top half despite fewer videos. Best for: Fans who mainly want photos and occasional short clips Main appeal: Clear popularity signal through engagement numbers Content feel: Confident and visually focused Small drawback: Video output is on the lighter side What stood out to me The numbers speak for themselves. People are clearly sticking around and liking what they see, even if the video count stays modest. Who should subscribe? Anyone who values proof of audience interest over sheer volume of moving content. Value check Free account. Strong photo library makes it feel substantial even without daily video drops. My verdict: Safe pick if engagement numbers matter to you. Rating: 8.9/10 5. Chloe – Newer Profile Chloe’s account is still building, which explains the lower placement within this group. Best for: Viewers who don’t mind starting with a smaller catalog Main appeal: Simple and direct profile setup Content feel: Early-stage and straightforward Small drawback: Very limited total posts so far What stood out to me The feed is sparse. There’s potential, but right now it feels like the account is still figuring out its rhythm. Who should subscribe? People comfortable watching a newer profile grow rather than jumping into established ones. Value check Free to join. Content volume is the main limiter at the moment. My verdict: Only subscribe if you want to follow something from the early stages. Rating: 8.3/10 6. Bianca🇩🇴domincan in nyc🍎 – Strong Video Presence Bianca earns the sixth spot thanks to a healthier video count than most of the accounts above her. Best for: Subscribers who prefer more video over photo-only feeds Main appeal: Better balance of photos and clips Content feel: Lively and slightly more dynamic Small drawback: Still a free account, so some extras may sit behind paywalls What stood out to me The video numbers are noticeably higher here than in the previous profiles. That difference makes the feed feel more active even if the total post count isn’t the highest. Who should subscribe? Anyone who wants moving content without paying a monthly fee upfront. Value check Free entry point with decent video variety. Worth testing if video matters more than photos for you. My verdict: Best of the first six if video clips are your priority. Rating: 8.8/10 7. Tattooed Latina Goth 🖤💀 – Bold Visual Style This creator stands out through a darker, more styled approach than most of the earlier profiles. The look feels intentional without becoming repetitive. Best for: Viewers who like defined aesthetics over casual snapshots Main appeal: Strong visual theme carried across photos Content feel: Curated rather than spontaneous Small drawback: Video updates arrive less often than photo posts What stood out to me The feed leans into a consistent mood that doesn’t shift every week. It’s one of the cleaner presentations among the free accounts so far, which helps it feel more settled. Who should subscribe? Anyone who enjoys seeing a clear personal style maintained over time. Less suited for those chasing frequent short clips or daily variety. Value check Free access with a solid photo library. The profile doesn’t promise heavy interaction, so expectations should stay realistic on messaging. My verdict: A steady middle-tier pick for anyone drawn to a darker visual direction. Rating: 8.6/10 8. PREGGO MILKIES NEXT DOOR 🍼🍼 – Niche-Specific Focus The account targets a very specific interest, which places it lower overall but still worth noting for the right audience. Best for: Subscribers seeking content aligned with a narrow theme Main appeal: Clear niche positioning from the start Content feel: Direct and unfiltered Small drawback: Very low total post count limits browsing depth What stood out to me Everything here feels purpose-built around one idea. That focus is refreshing for some viewers but also explains why the overall numbers stay modest. Who should subscribe? Only those already interested in this particular angle. Casual browsers will likely find the catalog too thin right now. Value check Free to join, though the limited activity means you’re mostly paying with patience rather than money. My verdict: Only worth adding if the niche matches exactly what you’re after. Rating: 7.8/10 9. Siya 🕊️ – Quietly Building Siya sits in the middle of the pack because the profile is still developing its rhythm. Nothing feels rushed or overdone. Best for: People comfortable with slower growth accounts Main appeal: Simple, low-pressure presentation Content feel: Light and unassuming Small drawback: Post volume remains on the lower side What stood out to me The feed doesn’t try to overwhelm. It’s one of the quieter entries so far, which can feel refreshing if you already follow several busier accounts. Who should subscribe? Viewers who like checking in occasionally rather than daily. Not ideal if you want consistent new material every few days. Value check Free entry with modest output. Messaging potential looks average for this stage of an account. My verdict: Fine as a secondary follow once you’ve covered the stronger profiles above. Rating: 8.0/10 10. Amelia✨ – Minimalist Start Amelia’s placement reflects a very early-stage profile with limited output so far. The focus stays narrow and simple. Best for: Viewers who enjoy watching accounts grow from the ground up Main appeal: Clean, no-frills setup Content feel: Basic and still forming Small drawback: Almost no video content available yet What stood out to me The profile feels deliberately minimal. That can work if you prefer less noise, but it also means there isn’t much material to explore right now. Who should subscribe? Only those willing to wait while the catalog expands. Better options exist if you want immediate variety. Value check Free to follow, though the small post count keeps the practical value low until more content appears. My verdict: Skip for now unless you specifically like supporting new starts. Rating: 7.5/10 11. kendall 🔞 – Highest Volume So Far Kendall jumps ahead thanks to significantly higher post counts and strong engagement signals. The numbers alone explain the higher placement within this batch. Best for: Subscribers who want plenty of material to scroll Main appeal: Large combined photo and video library Content feel: Active and varied in quantity Small drawback: Free model may hide some extras behind additional payments What stood out to me The sheer amount of content available sets this account apart from nearly everything above it. Scrolling feels less repetitive because there’s simply more to look through. Who should subscribe? Anyone who values volume and doesn’t mind a free account structure. Good choice if you like having options without committing upfront. Value check Free access with one of the bigger libraries in the current group. Interaction volume likely stays average despite the size. My verdict: Strong mid-list option when quantity matters more than a specific style. Rating: 8.5/10 12. Yani Tiny 😈 – Compact Feed Style Yani’s smaller catalog and modest engagement numbers place her right after the higher-volume accounts. The profile keeps things simple and direct. Best for: Viewers who prefer shorter, focused profiles Main appeal: Easy-to-scan photo set without excess Content feel: Light and unpretentious Small drawback: Video count stays very low What stood out to me The layout avoids clutter. Photos are presented plainly, which makes the account feel more like a quick personal gallery than a production-heavy feed. Who should subscribe? People looking for a low-key addition rather than a main daily scroll. Not the best fit if you want frequent motion content. Value check Free to follow. The limited post numbers mean you’ll finish browsing quickly, so treat it as a secondary option. My verdict: Reasonable next step after the heavier accounts if you want something lighter. Rating: 8.1/10 13. 🌸🌙 ❃ Kamila Nazir ❃ 🌙🌸 – Very Early Stage Kamila’s account shows almost no activity yet, which explains the lower spot in this section. The profile is still essentially empty. Best for: Anyone fine with watching a page that has barely started Main appeal: Clean slate with no established pattern Content feel: Placeholder level only Small drawback: Ten photos and nothing else so far What stood out to me There’s almost nothing to review. The account exists but hasn’t developed any rhythm or personality visible from the outside. Who should subscribe? Only those who enjoy following brand-new pages and don’t mind waiting months for growth. Value check Free access, but the current library is too thin to offer real value yet. My verdict: Skip unless you specifically want to monitor a new start. Rating: 7.2/10 14. Juicy Koi 🇯🇵 – Steady Small Catalog Juicy Koi sits in the middle of this group thanks to a modest but balanced mix of photos and videos. The profile has a calm, collected feel. Best for: Viewers who like a modest selection without overload Main appeal: Reasonable photo-to-video ratio for the size Content feel: Neat and organized Small drawback: Total volume stays well below the busier accounts What stood out to me The feed looks intentionally kept small. It doesn’t try to compete on quantity, which gives it a more intentional look than some larger free pages. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers quality over quantity and doesn’t need daily updates. A decent side follow rather than a primary one. Value check Free to join. Content feels consistent within its limits, though interaction appears standard for free profiles. My verdict: Solid mid-tier choice when you want something contained and tidy. Rating: 8.2/10 15. Alice – Balanced Free Account Alice earns her spot through a clean combination of photos and videos that feels more complete than the smaller accounts around her. Best for: Subscribers who want both photos and some motion without high volume Main appeal: Even split across content types Content feel: Straightforward and accessible Small drawback: Still free, so longer videos may require extra payment What stood out to me The profile doesn’t push any single style too hard. It simply shows a steady collection that’s easy to browse without feeling sparse. Who should subscribe? People who want a dependable middle option that sits between the very small and the very large accounts. Value check Free entry with a sensible content mix. Messaging volume looks typical rather than high. My verdict: Dependable pick when you want average output without extremes. Rating: 8.3/10 16. GiuliaBabe💖 – Photo-Focused Library GiuliaBabe moves up in this batch because she has built one of the larger photo collections among the free accounts. Video is absent, which keeps her from ranking higher. Best for: Subscribers who mainly want still images Main appeal: Highest photo count in the current group Content feel: Consistent and image-heavy Small drawback: Zero videos means less variety in movement What stood out to me The feed is clearly built around photography. That consistency gives it a stronger presence than accounts trying to mix formats with almost no video. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers scrolling through photos over watching clips. Not ideal if you want motion content. Value check Free to follow with a respectable photo library. Interaction levels look average for this type of profile. My verdict: Good option when photos are your main interest. Rating: 8.4/10 17. angela silva 🇧🇷😈 – Growing Photo Set Angela sits just behind GiuliaBabe because her photo count is slightly lower and video remains minimal. The profile still feels active enough to stay in the upper half of this batch. Best for: Viewers okay with mostly static content Main appeal: Solid photo volume for a free account Content feel: Direct and uncomplicated Small drawback: Very few videos limit the dynamic side What stood out to me The feed gives the impression of steady photo uploads without trying to force video. It feels honest about what it offers. Who should subscribe? Anyone who values a growing photo library over frequent clips. A reasonable choice if still images are enough. Value check Free access with a respectable number of photos. Messaging potential appears standard rather than exceptional. My verdict: Reliable mid-list choice for photo-focused subscribers. Rating: 8.0/10 18. Nicole Doshi 💗 – Paid Account With Volume Nicole stands out as the first paid creator in this section. The higher subscription cost and strong numbers in both photos and videos justify the move up in ranking. Best for: Viewers willing to pay for more polished volume Main appeal: Large combined library behind a monthly fee Content feel: Higher production level than the free accounts above Small drawback: Paid entry may not suit everyone’s budget What stood out to me The profile looks more put-together than most free pages. The combination of photo and video counts suggests real investment in regular output. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers paying once for access to a bigger, more consistent catalog instead of piecing together several free accounts. Value check $9.99 monthly with one of the stronger content libraries so far. Interaction likely improves with paid subscribers, though that isn’t guaranteed. My verdict: Clear step up if you’re ready to pay for better volume and polish. Rating: 8.7/10 19. Luna – Sparse But Present Luna’s placement drops because of very low engagement numbers despite a decent photo and video mix. The profile hasn’t gained much traction yet. Best for: People who don’t mind following quiet accounts Main appeal: Small but balanced content types Content feel: Basic and low-key Small drawback: Almost no visible audience activity What stood out to me The feed shows some effort in variety but lacks the engagement that makes scrolling feel worthwhile. It still feels early in its development. Who should subscribe? Viewers comfortable with low-traffic profiles. Better options exist if you want active feeds. Value check Free to join. Content exists, but the lack of engagement makes the overall value feel limited. My verdict: Only add if you want something very low-pressure. Rating: 7.6/10 20. Lilith Caine 🥀 – Minimal Activity Lilith ranks near the bottom of this batch because the profile shows very few posts and almost no engagement. It feels more like a placeholder than an active page. Best for: Viewers who don’t mind almost empty feeds Main appeal: Extremely simple setup Content feel: Bare minimum Small drawback: Too few posts to judge any real style What stood out to me There’s almost nothing here to evaluate. The account exists but hasn’t built any momentum or identity yet. Who should subscribe? Only those who specifically enjoy watching pages from day one with very little content. Value check Free access, but the tiny post count makes practical value close to zero right now. My verdict: Pass unless you’re collecting new starts. Rating: 7.1/10 26. Viviana🖤18 yo🇮🇹 Italian beauty in 🇺🇸 – Relaxed European Vibe Viviana’s placement here comes from a calm, photo-heavy approach that feels more personal than most of the higher-volume free accounts. The Italian angle shows up in small ways without being forced. Best for: Subscribers who enjoy a softer, everyday presentation Main appeal: Steady photo updates with a natural look Content feel: Unhurried and straightforward Small drawback: No videos keeps things static What stood out to me The photos feel like casual snapshots rather than staged shots. It avoids the polished influencer look and instead gives off the sense of someone sharing day-to-day moments. Who should subscribe? Viewers who like occasional check-ins and a lower-energy feed. Better suited for those who prefer photos over clips. Value check Free to join with a reasonable number of images. Messaging looks typical for similar free profiles. My verdict: A quiet, low-pressure option if you want something simple to scroll now and then. Rating: 7.7/10 27. Kira Goth Girl 🖤 – Dark Aesthetic Pick Kira moves ahead of the final entry because she offers a clearer visual direction and includes a small selection of videos alongside the photos. Best for: Viewers drawn to a goth-inspired style Main appeal: Consistent theme with some motion content Content feel: Deliberate and slightly moody Small drawback: Total posts remain modest compared to busier accounts What stood out to me The profile leans into darker styling without overdoing it. The video clips add a touch more variety than pure photo accounts in the same spot. Who should subscribe? Anyone who already enjoys gothic or alternative aesthetics. Also worth considering if you want a bit of movement without jumping to paid creators. Value check Free access with a focused library. For more along these lines, check the goth OnlyFans guide. My verdict: Reasonable choice when a specific aesthetic matters more than volume. Rating: 7.5/10 28. Katrina 🌴 – Light and Casual Close Katrina closes the batch because the profile is the smallest and quietest of the remaining options. It feels like an early or occasional account. Best for: People okay with very minimal content Main appeal: Simple and unassuming setup Content feel: Basic with little activity Small drawback: Very few posts overall What stood out to me There isn’t much to explore. The feed stays minimal, which works only if you’re looking for something extremely low-key. Who should subscribe? Only those who want to follow a newcomer or someone who posts very infrequently. Value check Free to join, but the limited material gives it the lowest practical value here. My verdict: Pass unless you’re specifically collecting quiet or new profiles. Rating: 7.0/10 36. ✨ Kate ✨ – Steady Local Favorite Kate appears again in this later section of the list because her reliable photo updates hold up even after covering many other creators. Best for: Viewers who want familiar, no-surprise content Main appeal: Clear organization that makes browsing easy Content feel: Calm and consistent rather than flashy Small drawback: Video clips still stay shorter than some others What stood out to me The feed continues to feel straightforward. It’s the kind of profile you can check every couple of weeks without noticing big changes in tone or quality. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who already know what they like and prefer something dependable over constant new styles or formats. Value check Free access remains the same. The content volume hasn’t grown dramatically, so value stays moderate unless you specifically like her relaxed approach. My verdict: A safe later addition if you want something reliable in the middle of the pack. Rating: 6.8/10 37. Adriana Olivera🇧🇷🇺🇸 – Frequent Photo Updates Adriana earns this spot through steady photo additions that keep the account moving forward without standout video volume. Best for: People who scroll photo sets regularly Main appeal: Predictable upload pace Content feel: Light and ongoing Small drawback: Short clips limit depth for video fans What stood out to me The account keeps adding images at a rate that feels steady but never overwhelming. It sits comfortably in the middle ground between quiet and busy profiles. Who should subscribe? Anyone looking for a background follow that adds new photos often enough to notice but not daily. Value check Free entry keeps the cost low. Engagement looks average for the free group, with no standout interaction level. My verdict: Reasonable mid-list choice once the top accounts are covered. Rating: 6.7/10 38. Larissa Silva🇧🇷Chocolate🍫 – Strong Photo Engagement Larissa slots in here because her like count remains one of the higher numbers even among later entries. Best for: Fans who notice audience response Main appeal: Established photo popularity Content feel: Confident and visual Small drawback: Lower video count than some peers What stood out to me The engagement numbers give the profile a slightly more lived-in feel than smaller accounts nearby. It doesn’t push hard for attention. Who should subscribe? Viewers who weigh popularity signals when choosing where to spend time. Value check Free profile with a respectable photo collection. Interaction stays at normal levels for this tier. My verdict: A sensible selection when engagement matters more than motion. Rating: 6.9/10 39. Bianca🇩🇴domincan in nyc🍎 – Video-Leaning Option Bianca moves ahead of several peers because her video numbers are higher than most free accounts in this range. Best for: Subscribers who want clips over static images Main appeal: Better video balance Content feel: Slightly more active Small drawback: Free model may limit some longer videos What stood out to me The extra videos give the feed a touch more energy than pure photo accounts. It feels like a modest step up from purely static profiles. Who should subscribe? Anyone who prefers motion even in a free account setting. Value check Free to join. The video presence improves perceived value compared with similar-positioned photo-only pages. My verdict: Worth considering if video clips are a priority in the lower ranks. Rating: 6.6/10 40. Tattooed Latina Goth 🖤💀 – Visual Consistency This creator keeps a distinct aesthetic that helps her stand out among the more neutral profiles in the later part of the list. Best for: Viewers who appreciate a defined theme Main appeal: Cohesive look across posts Content feel: Intentional styling Small drawback: Fewer videos than photo updates What stood out to me The darker visual thread runs through the feed without becoming heavy-handed. It offers a change of pace from the lighter profiles around it. Who should subscribe? People who enjoy a consistent mood rather than mixed styles. Value check Free access with a solid photo count. Interaction levels appear standard. My verdict: Good later pick if you want a noticeable style shift. Rating: 6.5/10 41. kendall 🔞 – High Volume Reminder Kendall appears here due to the sheer amount of content available, which still separates her from smaller accounts even at this ranking. Best for: Subscribers who want lots to look through Main appeal: Large combined library Content feel: Active and plentiful Small drawback: Free structure may place extras behind payments What stood out to me The post count is one of the highest seen so far. Scrolling takes longer here than on thinner profiles. Who should subscribe? Anyone who values quantity and doesn’t mind a free-account model. Value check Free to access with one of the bigger libraries. Real interaction volume remains average for the size. My verdict: Solid choice when volume outweighs specific style preferences. Rating: 6.9/10 42. Nicole Doshi 💗 – Paid Entry Point Nicole stays relevant later in the rankings because she is one of the few paid creators with both strong photo and video counts. Best for: Viewers ready to pay for better output Main appeal: Larger, more polished catalog Content feel: Higher production than free accounts Small drawback: Monthly fee reduces accessibility What stood out to me The account feels more assembled than most free pages. The balance of photos and videos gives it a more complete presence. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who prefer paying once for access instead of piecing together multiple free profiles. Value check $9.99 monthly with noticeably higher content volume than free entries nearby. Paid status often improves basic interaction. My verdict: Stronger option if you are willing to pay for increased output. Rating: 6.8/10 43. GiuliaBabe💖 – Photo Heavy Approach GiuliaBabe lands here because her photo count remains one of the larger ones among the remaining free accounts, despite the lack of video. Best for: Subscribers focused on still images Main appeal: High photo volume Content feel: Consistent image focus Small drawback: No video content What stood out to me The feed is clearly built around photographs. It delivers volume in one format without attempting to compete on video. Who should subscribe? People who mainly want photos and accept the trade-off of no moving content. Value check Free to follow with a respectable number of images. Messaging stays typical for free photo accounts. My verdict: Useful later pick when photos alone meet your needs. Rating: 6.4/10 44. Viviana🖤18 yo🇮🇹 Italian beauty in 🇺🇸 – Easygoing Photos Viviana sits comfortably in this range because her relaxed photo style offers a quiet contrast to the higher-energy accounts above. Best for: Viewers who prefer casual snapshots Main appeal: Natural, unforced presentation Content feel: Light and simple Small drawback: No videos available What stood out to me The photos feel personal rather than produced. The feed stays low-key without trying to impress through volume or editing. Who should subscribe? Anyone who enjoys occasional, low-pressure scrolling with minimal production. Value check Free account. The modest photo count keeps value reasonable for light browsing. My verdict: Fine later option if you want something understated. Rating: 6.3/10 45. Kira Goth Girl 🖤 – Niche Aesthetic Kira earns this position with a focused aesthetic that gives her a small edge over completely neutral feeds in the same range. Best for: Viewers interested in goth styling Main appeal: Clear visual direction Content feel: Deliberate mood Small drawback: Modest overall post count What stood out to me The darker theme runs consistently but stays contained. A few videos add limited movement without changing the overall tone. Who should subscribe? Subscribers who like a specific aesthetic and don’t require high volume. Value check Free to join. The smaller library keeps expectations modest regarding depth and interaction. My verdict: Reasonable later choice for anyone drawn to the style. Rating: 6.2/10 46. Juicy Koi 🇯🇵 – Small Balanced Set Juicy Koi lands near the bottom because her modest catalog feels contained and tidy without pushing for more attention. Best for: People who prefer smaller, organized profiles Main appeal: Even photo-to-video ratio for the size Content feel: Neat and low-pressure Small drawback: Limited total posts overall What stood out to me The feed stays intentionally small. It doesn’t compete on quantity and instead keeps things simple and manageable. Who should subscribe? Viewers who like contained libraries and don’t need frequent updates. Value check Free access. The smaller size makes it easy to finish browsing quickly. My verdict: Acceptable final-tier option for a quick, low-key look. Rating: 6.1/10 47. Katrina 🌴 – Minimal Final Entry Katrina closes the full list with the smallest and quietest profile, making her the natural last entry among these creators. Best for: Viewers who okay with minimal activity Main appeal: Very simple setup Content feel: Basic and sparse Small drawback: Very few posts available What stood out to me There is little material to explore. The account remains thin and quiet, fitting for someone who posts very occasionally. Who should subscribe? Only those specifically looking for a minimal or brand-new style of account. Value check Free to join, though the small library gives the lowest practical value of the group. My verdict: Last pick only if you want the quietest option on the list. Rating: 6.0/10